Warning: Wrong parameter count for trigger_error() in /home/firstrat/public_html/_inc/api.php on line 184



Uploaded by:
Video Description:



Tags for this video:

Find more videos in the "" category
See more videos uploaded by



Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Also, I wish some ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
Also, I wish some people would defend their opinions rather than do the typical reactionary thing; that is, voting my posts down. I understand that Gould's interpretations make people emotional, but I do NOT think it is because of his phrasing. His phrasing is not great. His humming, legacy, gestures, reputation, technique, and tempo choices all scream unconventional. Gould was obsessed with Bach's technical genius, but I think he was relatively unmoved by his musical genius.
Array ( 1 month ago by debartzen)
Emoci
ón llevada al último extremo.
What can be said or ... ( 1 month ago by pianogus)
What can be said or added to all that's been said about Glenn Gould. He is a genius madly and inexorably in love with music. How inspiring is that to all who love life and music.
Again, I agree with ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
Again, I agree with most of what you say, but at times for the wrong reasons. I mean, to me a piece of music need not depend on a performer to be emotionally expressive, provided the performer doesn't mutilate it of course. I just seem to be reiterating my points all over youtube and yes most of the time all I'm greeted with are thumbs down not a counter argument as I would have hoped for. You were an exception, but I must say there are rare, most as you said opt do 'typical reactionary thing'.
You know, you and ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
You know, you and the few others who've argued with me the point about the extend to which Baroque music is emotionally expressive has made me thing but, no matter how objectively or subjectively or openly I listen to Baroque music all I can feel is a sense of spirituality. It's almost perfectly beautiful music and in that lies an almost enigmatic feeling of aesthetic appreciation that really pulls at your heart strings but it's just not specific enough for me to call and emotion.
It's too grand, ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
It's too grand, it's too large a scale, it's too perfect for me to perceive Bach on a primitively emotional level. I can understand how Russeau's Naturalism was such a strong movement against Bach's music and there in to me lies the greatest strength of Baroque music and quite honestly I don't need to go beyond that to better appreciate Bach ( even though I must say I have tried). When it comes to Gould though, I agree with you completely. He was a great thinker, there's no denying that but...
...as you said too ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
...as you said too much of technician. However I must say when listening to him talk about Bach and his music you do sense that he does know Bach really was musically but all of it seemed to be cramped in a technical framework and in doing so, atleast to me, his phrasing at times seems to go in opposite directions to the music message Bach was trying to convey and Gould was trying to interpret. But as unconventional as it might be I like his choice of tempo in most cases. Anyway, good day.
Now that is ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
Now that is interesting. You say "spirituality". To me it is difficult to separate spirituality and emotion. For instance, in BWV 566, the fugue at the end is absolutely exuberant around the 9:30-10:00 mark. (NOT 565, 566) It truly paints joy and sounds like a celebration of life. This point in the music is more expressive to me than say another one of Chopin's countless Mazurkas, regardless of who's performing it. I certainly agree that a piece of music does not need a performer to...
...recognize the ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
...recognize the composition's intended expression whether it be the constructs of the harmony, rhythm, tempo markings, etc. I heard a very dry interpretation of the Waldstein Sonata once that nearly put me to sleep. I knew what Beethoven intended sure, but the performer had a very immature understanding of the music. Conversely, when I heard Christopher Herrick's BWV 543 prelude interpretation I teared up because of his sensitivity when the piece modulated to the major towards the end...
In other words, I ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
In other words, I guess I DO believe that in order for a piece to come alive it requires a great interpreter. Otherwise, it's just a perfunctory action much like data entry. And, ironically enough, I feel like Gould is the ultimate Bach data entry performer, only he really really enjoys the data entry part, and that's what we're watching...his love for Bach's data! haha
Data entry is ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
Data entry is actually a pretty accurate way of putting it. Yes, we certainly agree on how good or bad Gould is. I mean, what I value in him is his ability to somehow justify his methods. Methods that might not be as good as others, but none the less his reasoning behind is sound. In fact I quite like some of Glenn Gould's Romantic interpretations as opposed to the Bach he's so renowned for. I remember a few days ago I listened to his rendition of the first movement of the moonlight sonata...
It was the first ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
It was the first time in my life I managed to get pass the C sharp minor arpeggio without falling asleep. Of course you could argue that he was merely following Beethoven's tempo marking-more or less- but my point is he did do it and I liked it. When it comes to Bach though, just sometimes Gould has that tendency to sound like a MIDI playback through a relatively intelligence computer. Data entry, I suppose.
And now to the ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
And now to the topic where tempers are inevitably going to be tested; spirituality and emotion? More or less the same? Bach's BWV 565. Expressive, I would most certainly agree. Spiritual, undoubtedly (my remorse to all those who are blinded by that thick thick coating of very very bad media publicity). Emotions? Is a celebration of life, really an emotion? I mean, there are emotions associated with this but is it really the composers intention to attribute these associated emotions with the....
...music itself or ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
...music itself or rather the 'celebration' you allude to. The same goes to this spirituality I refer to. There are emotions attributed to it but the musical devices used aren't really to express emotion but rather to express something beyond that. It's almost like the Lutheran concept of music, to me. It alleviates your senses to this ecstatic level that really is an absolutely spirituality and in this transcendental spur I suppose we can experience anything.
Bach, as I'm sure ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
Bach, as I'm sure was Martin Luthor's intentions, experience God and you experience joy. A Chopin prelude doesn't do this. It's simply not Bach. It doesn't even attempt, nor will it ever accomplish, the elevating( It's 'elevate about, btw, not 'alleviate') function Baroque music does and in that sense that music is not subjective. You feel what Chopin wanted you to feel, not what you would. It's difficult music. Bach, on the other hand; his intentions are of no importance when it comes to...
...emotional ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
...emotional expressiveness. To me Bach is a vessel, of sorts. You can't describe or limit a Bach piece as merely sad or merry or depressing or agitating, you can't do that. You have to describe Bach in absolute musical terms because that is what he does. He uses music to transport us to 'God', so to speak, to transport us to that place where we really can experience anything, absolutely anything. That to me is spirituality in music. That to me is one of Bach's music's functions.
I for one cannot ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
I for one cannot put to words, or identify why certain pieces of Bach's affect me in certain ways and that is because it's a subjective process. It's not written in the music. It's not Bach's intention to express one emotion, but to give you means to express your own self in your own little private realm of perception. That's why I said Bach's music isn't emotionally expressive. It isn't. To me it just isn't. It has a lot of mind in it. I mean certain pieces might imply you should feel a...
...certain way that ... ( 1 month ago by TintedReasoning)
...certain way that doesn't mean that you ultimately feel it.That's just an intellectual expression of an emotion, nothing more.Much like the emotions a well tempered tuning system would make us yield to much of the intellectual expressiveness of Bach's is codified,ordered and planned out. But I am aware of the music beyond that, believe me I am. It's all beautiful and in that beauty we transcend the music. But beauty is something of the mind, not the heart. Anyways, good day. =)
Ha! Great ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
Ha! Great responses! And DEFINITELY worthy of a reply. Firstly, let me reiterate. I wasn't talking about 565, but 566!!!! 566. Listen to the 566 fugue. Ok, so you are being very specific. Spirituality and emotion are different. I understand that. I guess I do, that is. We could play a semantics or webster game, but the ultimate judge is the eye of the beholder. Sometimes these terms are interchangeable and sometimes they are not. You ostensibly think all the time the latter?
It's crazy. When I ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
It's crazy. When I listen to Bach it's as if I hear another great composer saying, "shit, I could do better, forget about all the sappy superficial stuff, can you hear this? can you really? b/c I don't care if you do or if you don't. I have a God to serve and kids to feed....bitch." That's what I hear if Liszt or Brahms really tried and got over their spoiled lives.
Then again, I could ... ( 1 month ago by flipscratch81)
Then again, I could be very unfair here. It's just, I grew up hearing the B minor sonata, hungarian rhapsody, tons of Brahms pieces, and so much romantic harmony. I also grew up hearing Bach in church. I had a fair choice. And now....what makes me emotional? well, Bach.
This is so ... ( 1 month ago by lumberjackv)
This is so beautiful. I am mesmerized.
SO am I.....I love ... ( 1 month ago by lifeisacrapp)
SO am I.....I love this guy:-D
I hear that when ... ( 4 weeks ago by FriendlyCroock)
I hear that when your mother first saw you, she decided to leave you on the front steps of a police station while she turned herself in....Bitch !



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 



Tips to help you create better videos

1. Eye Candy.
Think about some of your favorite videos, ask yourself, what interesting shots and b-roll need to be captured to make your video entertaining to watch.

2. Good Lighting.
The main difference between amateur and professional videos is the quality of the lighting. Poor lighting creates graininess and poor quality videos too. (*Hint* In most studios, the lights and the cameras can be adjusted up and down to get the correct amount of light.) For your home studio make use of fluorescent light bulbs. These bulbs produce a nice soft light with no harsh shadows. You can buy fluorescent light kits or you can save a lot of money and make your own fluorescent light box. It is best to use a three point lighting system which is fairly standard in most studios.

3. Tripod.
Use a tripod for shake free shooting. Tripods come in all sizes and quality. Most camcorders used today are only small and weigh very little so there is no need to buy a tripod to suit a heavy professional video camera.

4. Microphone.
The built in microphone on your camcorder is not the best to use if you can avoid it. Buy a directional one that can be mounted on top of your camcorder. Otherwise mount the microphone on a boom or support just out of view of the camcorder but close to the subject. Another option is to use a microphone that clips onto your lapel and as used by newsreaders on television. These are very effective and can be purchased for less than $50. No need to buy a wireless unit, but you need enough cable to run from the camcorder remote microphone, up the inside of your shirt and to your lapel. Bear in mind that you will normally be seated within six feet of the camcorder so the microphone should have plenty of cable.

5. Avoid Zooming and Panning.
Avoid zooming in and out and panning from side to side as much as possible. It is recommended that you set the zoom prior to recording.

6. Pre-Roll and Post-Roll.
Allow a few extra seconds after starting and before stopping the camcorder and the actual start and finish of the action you want to record. This allows for better editing once the shooting is over. Not allowing for the pre-roll and post-roll can make editing difficult. If you are filming yourself then start the camcorder recording with the remote control, wait six seconds before you start talking and at the end let the camcorder run an extra six seconds before stopping. This will give you plenty of time when editing.

7. Remember It is A Small Screen.
When shooting videos to add to your web site, normally the player will be 320 x 240 so avoid wide scenes, keep it close to see the detail. If you are filming yourself talking, you should be within six feet of the camera and preferably from the waist up. Keep the content simple and uncomplicated, do not have much happening in the video and keep it quiet-on-the-set.

8. Think Like a Photographer.
When shooting a video, do it like a photographer taking individual shots. Plan your video shoot, record for a short while from one position then stop recording, reposition the camera or yourself then shoot again. This will reduce excessive camera movement in your video. Using these tips will ensure that you can shoot and produce quality website videos of a better quality than most people. Remember, practice makes perfect and soon you will be getting great results on the first take.

9. Look at the Details.
Sometimes, you are so focused on your subject that you do not notice the surrounding elements of the scene. Only later, when you are reviewing the footage do you notice an unsightly trash can in the background or a tree sticking out of your subjects head. I like to scan the video screen carefully before shooting to make sure there is nothing in the shot that I may have overlooked. You may be surprised what you find!

Use our search feature, at the top of the page, to find videos about your favorite topics. There are tons of videos, for example, type in "Bikini contest", "Body building", "Guitar lesson", or "How to (anything)". Search for "Commercial", you will see cool ads and funny commercials. Notice the video techniques used to capture each video, you may very well find many helpful tips and tricks to use as well as many techniques to avoid when making your own videos... have fun.